Georgetown Symposium on Islamist Politics
Friday, June 22,2007 00:00
By Margeret Hall, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs

THE GEORGETOWN University Center for Contemporary Arab Studies held its annual symposium in Washington, DC March 22 and 23, on the theme “Islamist Politics: Contemporary Trajectories in the Arab World.”

An appreciative audience of experts, students and interested observers took part in two days of lively discussion. The panelists, who represented a variety of universities, think tanks, political parties and media in the Middle East, discussed a wide range of topics, including historical and current Islamic theorists, the role of social networks in Islamist parties, Islamists and national liberation parties, and current Islamist groups in power.

“Islamists as Opposition Movements” panelist Dr. Francois Burgat, a noted political scientist with the National Center for Scientific Research in France, cited Morocco, Egypt, and Palestine as examples of a major difficulty facing Islamist parties. As a party achieves power and gains stature, he explained, its ability to influence and make policy is largely taken away by government figureheads, leaving the party with little more than “empty power.” Dr. Nathan Brown of the Carnegie Institute for Peace agreed, adding, “Islamist parties lose elections deliberately, due to international and domestic limitations placed upon them.”

Mohamad Saad El Katatny, chief representative of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood (MB) Parliamentary bloc, concluded the conference by delivering a strong statement about the relationship between Islamists and the West. He charged that Washington’s unequivocal support for the Mubarak regime is anti-democratic because of the regime’s repressive nature, and drew attention to a set of unpopular constitutional amendments Egyptians would vote for on March 26.

“U.S. support for unpopular regimes is one of the main reasons for the popularity of Islamists,” El Katatny contended. “Moderate groups like the MBs will continue to struggle, but more people will be driven to radical discourse by repressive governments. This is most harmful for Western security.”

Related Topics:


Stacher & Shehata: US should talk to MB
By Issandr El Amrani
Strategic Thinking about the Muslim Brotherhood
Robert S. Leiken and Steven Brooke, US
Ikhwan Complex:
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
MB Today [About MB]
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
Online Library
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
The vision of MB concerning reform and development
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
Time to take a stand on Egypt’s democracy
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
Democracy also means that Islamists are allowed to vote
Ikhwanweb, London-UK
Time to take a stand on Egypt’s democracy
Ikhwanweb, London-UK
The Challenge of Democracy In the Muslim World
Ikhwanweb, London-UK
Shock! Comment is Free item concerning Islam actually half-decent!
By Barb Kerr(Barb Kerr)
Crackdown By A Clique
Abdel Moneim Abul Fotouh, The Guardian - Cairo, Egypt

Other Topics:

The Multifaceted Muslim Brotherhood
Marisa Morrison, The National Interest - Washington, DC, US
WH On Wrong Side Of Muslim Brotherhood
Stephen Glain, The Nation, U.S
Strategic Thinking about the Muslim Brotherhood
The National Interest Online - Washington,DC,USA
Which Will It Be, Stability or Democracy?
Nick Fielding, Antiwar.com - Redwood City,CA, US
The Muslim Brotherhood: Enemy or Ally?
Ikhwanweb, London-UK
We Must Engage With Moderate Muslims
Michael Gove, The Guardian - London, UK
Open Forum on The Muslim Brotherhood
Ikhwanweb, London-UK
United States stops entry of British Muslim leader
Reuters - USA
Muslim Brotherhood Opens Office in Washington
AINA - Modesto,CA,USA
NYU IN ISLAM FUROR
NYPOST.COM
Engaging Moderate Muslims—Really?
Steven Brooke, National Interest Online - Washington, U.S
Waiting For Futouh
Shadi Hamid, Democracy Arsenal , USA
Talk to the Brotherhood
The National Interest Online - Washington,DC,USA

 
[pdf] The moderate Muslim Brotherhood Robert Leiken and research associate Steven Brooke

 

http://www.ikhwanweb.com