Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
Research and Commentary
Tamer Fouad: Religious Slogans Between Freedom of Expression and Social Responsibility
Tamer Fouad: Religious Slogans Between Freedom of Expression and Social Responsibility
As I write this article, news has surfaced that the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), the Muslim Brotherhood’s political wing, will not use the Brotherhood’s famous motto “Islam is the Solution” in their political campaigns. Last week, the High Elections Commission issued a ban against the use of religious chants, symbols or slogans in the upcoming parliamentary elections.
Sunday, October 30,2011 15:13
by T. FOUAD, MD Democrati.net
As I write this article, news has surfaced that the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), the Muslim Brotherhood’s political wing, will not use the Brotherhood’s famous motto “Islam is the Solution” in their political campaigns. Last week, the High Elections Commission issued a ban against the use of religious chants, symbols or slogans in the upcoming parliamentary elections.  

Instead the FJP will campaign using its own slogan “We bring good for Egypt.” As a staunch liberal who personally favors separating religion from politics, I wholeheartedly commend the party’s decision. For years, many Egyptians have opposed the Brotherhood’s slogan, arguing it breeds sectarianism, monopolizes Islam, and violates the Constitution.

Prior to this decision, the Brotherhood had vehemently upheld its right to use the religious slogan, arguing that it was compatible with the Egyptian Constitution. However, one of the better arguments in support of the use of religious slogans came from a fellow blogger named Hatem Rushdy, whose argument was based not on religious convictions, or legal constraints, but surprisingly, from a liberal standpoint. Please find Mr. Rushdy’s blog in the reference section below.

Admittedly, I reacted with initial skepticism, which gradually gave way to mild irritation…

Rushdy was right of course. Legality disputes aside, and in a purely theoretical context, FJP’s right to campaign using religious slogans would fall under freedom of expression. If Liberals would practice what they preach they would not support the censorship of any person or party from the right to express itself simply on the grounds that they find it offensive or disagreeable.

tags: Freedom and Justice Party / FJP / Muslim Brotherhood / MB / Islam is the Solution / Parliamentary Elections / Constitution / Freedom of Expression / Blogger / Liberals
Posted in Research and Commentary  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
FJP Criticises Call For Presidential Candidates to Hold Debate in Washington
FJP Offers Condolences to Maspero Victims at Suez Church
FJP Will Not Impose Its Slogan on Other Parties Within Democractic Alliance
Beltagy: FJP Supports Democratic Alliance Despite Defections
FJP: Despite Differences With Maikel Nabil, We Oppose Military Trials For Civilians
FJP Regrets Loss of Lives in Maspiro Clashes, Calls for Restraint and Unity
Katatni: FJP Opts Out of "Return to Barracks" Friday Protest
750 Patients Treated in Free Mobile Hospital Organized by FJP
FJP Chairman: Code of Honour No Supra-Constitutional
FJP Praises Palestinian Prisoners Deal
FJP Demands SCAF to Set Clear Timeline for Power Transfer
FJP Rejects New Electoral Law Proposed by SCAF