Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Reform Issues
Ending the Nile water dispute
Ending the Nile water dispute
Over the weekend, Congolese President Joseph Kabila and Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga visited Egypt in an attempt to resolve Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) fractures after four upstream countries signed a new agreement without Egypt.
Sunday, May 30,2010 13:54
by Joseph Mayton BM&Ikhwanweb
CAIRO: Over the weekend, Congolese President Joseph Kabila and Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga visited Egypt in an attempt to resolve Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) fractures after four upstream countries signed a new agreement without Egypt, the country that receives the lion’s share of water from the world’s longest river.

The resulting outrage from Egypt has left the NBI in doubt, with officials and observers questioning the viability of the decade-old 9-nation initiative.

Odinga and Kabila believe that their visit has pushed Cairo back to the table, after Egypt initially said it would have no contact with the upstream countries who had signed the new agreement.

Both African leaders affirmed their intention of not depriving Egypt of its water resources, but it has done little to quell worries that the geo-partnership is facing its stiffest test.

On May 14, Ethiopia, Uganda, Rwanda and Tanzania signed a new Cooperative Framework Agreement in Uganda, despite opposition from Egypt and Sudan. Kenya joined the new pact on May 19.

Last week, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi said on that the bullying of Egypt over the construction of dams along the Nile River must end as upstream nations attempt to implement a number of water projects despite Cairo’s opposition. He rejected threats by Egypt to prevent the erection of projects along the world’s longest river.

In an interview with Al Jazeera, Zenawi argued that a new era in the Nile basin has begun. His statements came less than one week after the new treaty on water-sharing along the Nile was inked.

Egypt and Sudan, the two countries with the most to lose, have shown massive opposition to the new agreement, which is expected to see the other three Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) countries Burundi, Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo ink the deal later this year.

The new agreement gives upstream nations the right to develop the river and implement a number of strategies to increase their own development and irrigation along the Nile.

It could mark the beginning of a fracture within the NBI and a new commission formed without Egypt and Sudan.

“Some people in Egypt have old-fashioned ideas based on the assumption that the Nile water belongs to Egypt, and that Egypt has a right to decide who gets what, and that the upper [Nile basin] countries are unable to use the Nile water because they will be unstable and they will be poor,” the Prime Minister said.

“These circumstances have changed and changed forever.

“Ethiopia is not unstable. Ethiopia is still poor, but it is able to cover the necessary resources to build whatever infrastructure and dams it wants on the Nile water,” he added.

Egypt is already pushing international donor bodies, such as the World Bank – the main financier of the NBI – to cut funding to the signatories.

According to World Bank officials last July in Alexandria, they would not fund any new project without the approval of Egypt.

“Egypt is the leading country in this consortium and the World Bank will not get behind any initiative that leaves them out,” a World Bank official said at the time on the sidelines of the NBI conference in the Egyptian port city.

The Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) ministers had met in Sharm el-Sheikh on April 13 in another attempt to come to agreement on a water-sharing deal, but Egypt again refused to renegotiate an 80-year-old treaty that ensures they receive the lion’s share of water from the Nile River.

According to the country’s MENA state news agency, the 10 nations failed to agree on a new deal, instead saying they will look for closer cooperation instead. This all changed on Saturday as the upstream nations apparently said enough is enough.

Burundi’s Environment Minister was disturbed at the proceedings, blaming Egypt for the lack of a new agreement that would give upstream nations, including his, a larger proportion of water for irrigation and development.

“Egypt is continuing to act as if they can do whatever they want, but the time is soon coming where they will not be able to dictate our water consumption, especially if they treat us this way,” said Minister Degratias N’Duimana.

Ugandan Minister of Water and Environment Maria Mutagamba, in her opening speech at the meeting in the Red Sea resort town of Sharm al-Sheikh called on her counterparts to sign the agreement without further delay.

Egypt’s Minister of Water Resources and Irrigation Mohamed Nasr el-din Allam refused, saying his nation required the treaty to remain the same with expected water shortages coming in the near future.

In February, a senior Egyptian water ministry official said that the Nile Basin nations do not suffer from these shortages and if they do it is because of misuse of the resource.

Saad Nassar, an advisor to the Egyptian agriculture minister, said the Nile Basin countries, in fact, “enjoy huge water resources.”

He said the quantity of rain water received by the upstream countries hits 1,800 billion cubic meters and that the quota of downstream countries (Egypt and Sudan) hits 73 billion cubic meters annually, 55 billion of which goes to Egypt and 18 billion goes to Sudan.

However, an NBI official told Bikya Masr in a phone conversation at the time that the Egyptian minister is “delusional if he honestly believes there are no problems and that if there are problems it arises from misuse by other countries along the river.”

The official, who asked not to be named, was irate over the official’s comments, adding that Egypt has been “continuing to push a new agreement to the backburner for months now because they know that they are taking way too much of the water and leaving other nations in a position where they cannot develop or even get enough water to their people. It is arrogance that these things are said.”

Nassar said that much of the water resources in the Nile Basin countries are excessively wasted, underlining his county’s keenness to make the best use of water for the benefit of both upstream and downstream countries.

The NBI nations met last summer in Kinshasa and Alexandria to hammer out a new agreement, but nothing came from those negotiations, as Egypt’s water ministry wouldn’t budge on its position to maintain its current water consumption.

Cairo refused to sign onto any convention without assurances by other members that the country would not lose the 55.5 billion cubic meters of Nile water they are allowed to use and demanded a veto power over any projects implemented upstream in southern Nile nations.                                                                                   Republished With Permission From Bikya Masr

tags: Nile / / Sudan / World Bank / Nile Basin / Nile
Posted in Reform Issues  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Who Cares Al-Hinawi
I think you should have read this comment carefully: \\\"Upstream countries have many sources and aren\\\'t managing our Nile properly,\\\" Mohamed Nasreddin Allam, Egypt\\\'s water resources and immigration minister, told Reuters. What does Egypt want? The whole Nile water and also for upstream countries to take care of it for them? Isn\\\'t this arrogant and too much to ask? In my view, the Egyptians should re-examine their own attitude and practice, which is residual colonialism. They should ask themselves what they have done to help (not 10 or 20 milion dollars/year they lan to throw which is nothing) the upstream countries to fight hunger and the pressures of overpopulation. Why should a country like Ethiopia that did not sign any of the earlier agreements be \\\"forced\\\" to accept the allocation to and veto of Egypt? True, Egypt and Sudan may not have enough rainfall. But they do have plenty of oil, which is a natral resource like water, that the upstream countries do not have. Do they share them at all? No. Rather than bullying, I think the best way forward is to consider a more equitable use of the water with Egypt and Sudan getting special consideration. In addition, Egypt and Sudan should consider compensating those countries for opportunity costs and water waste in unsustainable agriculture. Who said there is enough water in upstream countries? That is naive/deceptive or if anyone wishes to argue for that (Egypt, Sudan, etc), then they should help develop those resources. I don\\\'t think there is intention to deny those countries the water they need. It feels like very few people care about the well-being of Sub-Saharan Africans in the face failing rainfalls. Have you seen how much water is wasted in Egypt?
Tuesday, June 29,2010 22:56
Related Articles
Ending the Nile water dispute
Mubarak’s Last Breath
Why is the Arab world frozen in time?
ANHRI 2009 Report, Freedom of Expression in Egypt 2009
Egyptian officials express anger on Nile water basin agreement
Arab Doctors Union discuss Nile 's sharing agreement
MB: Despite restrictions we will continue our cause through peaceful and constitutional measures
Agreement for sharing Nile not so agreeable
Egypt launches first Arabic domain suffix
Egypt: The Next Volcano?
MB demands resisting the IOA's project
Cosmopolitan Islamism and its Critics
Islamic Televangelism: Religion, Media and Visuality in Contemporary Egypt
Commentary - the move away from big pan-Arab channels
Sorour summons Minister of Irrigation to discuss Nile Basin crisis
Hostage citizens and failed negotiations prompt parliament clashes
Crowd greets ElBaradei as hero during tour out of Cairo
Netanyahu’s Ring and the Legitimacy of Zionism
Social networking, political action and its real impact in Egypt
Egypt abuses emergency law with the illegal detention and torture of student Ibrahim Mogahed