Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
Palestine
United States-Israel Showdown?
United States-Israel Showdown?
If President Obama plays his cards right, he could bring down the extremist government of Bibi Netanyahu. But that depends on whether Obama displays the guts and gumption necessary for a full-frontal challenge to AIPAC and its allies, notes Robert Dreyfuss.
Wednesday, March 17,2010 01:11
by Robert Dreyfuss Middle East Online
The Israel lobby is mobilizing for what might turn into the most significant confrontation between the United States and Israel since, the Suez War of 1956, when President Eisenhower told Israel -- and its covert allies, the UK and France -- to halt the unprovoked assault on Egypt.

This time, if President Obama plays his cards right, he could bring down the extremist government of Bibi Netanyahu. But that depends on whether Obama displays the guts and gumption necessary for a full-frontal challenge to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and its allies.

A year ago, it seemed possible that Obama was headed in that direction. He'd nominated the even-handed George Mitchell as his Israel-Palestine special representative, to the discomfort of AIPAC. He'd installed a number of aides at the White House, including General Jones, Mara Rudman, and others who had sympathies with the Palestinians and with the Israeli pro-peace camp. And Obama launched a major effort to rebuild US ties with the Muslim world, including his June speech in Cairo, that all but required a stronger US effort to force concessions from Israel. He also had ordered a showdown with Israel over its illegal settlements in occupied Palestinian lands, demanding outright that Israel stop building them.

Nearly all of that has collapsed. Mitchell has gotten nowhere. Netanyahu has bluntly rejected the settlements demand, and keeps building them -- and facing no consequences. Worst of all, Obama has utterly failed to put forward an American peace plan to restart the talks. What was needed then, and now, is for Obama to outline what a final settlement of the conflict will look like: a return to the 1967 borders, the division of Jerusalem, the removal of Israeli encampments from the West Bank, a sovereign Palestinian state, a deal over the Palestinians' right to return to their land and probably some sort of US security guarantees for Israel.

Obama didn't deliver. He never stated the end goal. Now, he has another chance. His new opportunity was handed to him last week when Netanyahu's government slapped visiting Vice President Biden in face by announcing, during a high-stakes, delicate trip, a plan to build 1,600 new Jewish homes in occupied East Jerusalem. In the aftermath of that event, the entire Obama administration has been mobilized against Israel. The key question is not whether Obama and Co. will slam Israel rhetorically, as they've done, but whether there will be concrete consequences for Israel and whether the Obama team will finally relaunch the all-but-dead peace process by declaring the president's own vision of the terms that Israel, the Palestinians, and the Arab states must agree to.

Vice President Biden used the word "condemn" in reacting to Israel's defiant action, saying: "I condemn the decision." Then rhetorically at least, the United States got even nastier. Hillary Clinton -- who, like Biden, prides herself as being militantly pro-Israel -- used the word "insult" in slamming Israel: "The announcement of the settlements on the very day that the vice president was there was insulting," said Clinton. With Obama's approval, she delivered a 45-minute tongue lashing to Netanhayu over the phone. And this weekend, David Axelrod, the White House political adviser chimed in, saying: "What happened there was an affront. It was an insult."

Netanyahu, while faking an apology, insists -- as does his entire right-wing regime -- that it won't change policy or back down.

The lobby is mobilizing. AIPAC, in a defensive statement, called the whole thing a "distraction," and it added: "AIPAC calls on the Administration to take immediate steps to defuse the tension with the Jewish State. ... The Administration should make a conscious effort to move away from public demands and unilateral deadlines directed at Israel."

Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League accused the United States of a "gross overreaction" to the Israeli insult, adding: "We are shocked and stunned at the Administration's tone and public dressing down of Israel on the issue of future building in Jerusalem. We cannot remember an instance when such harsh language was directed at a friend and ally of the United States. One can only wonder how far the U.S. is prepared to go in distancing itself from Israel in order to placate the Palestinians in the hope they see it is in their interest to return to the negotiating table."

A panoply of Israel's best friends in Congress are also trying to preempt an Obama response to the Israeli insult that goes beyond rhetoric. Representive Shelley Berkley (D-Nevada) called the Clinton-Axelrod statements part of an "irresponsible overreaction," and John Boehner, the Republican leader in the House, told Commentary that "the tone and substance we are seeing emerge as a pattern for this Administration are both disappointing and of great concern."

Various neocons are weighing in as well. Elliott Abrams accused the Obama administration of "mishandling" relations with Israel in the Washington Post. Danielle Pletka of the American Enterprise Institute, expressed alarm about a "tectonic drift" pushing the US and Israel apart. And Robert Satloff of the militantly pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy warned: "It would be shortsighted for the administration to use this episode as an opportunity to reward the Palestinians."

Underlying all this is not just the reaction to an insulting announcement during the visit of Vice President Biden. Instead, at a more fundamental level, the Obama administration is beginning to realize that Israeli intransigence -- and the Netanyahu government, in particular -- is a major obstacle to US policy in the region, from Iraq to Iran to the struggle against Al Qaeda. It still remains to be seen if the White House has the courage to do anything about it. In 2009, it didn't.

Robert Dreyfuss is a contributing editor to The Nation magazine, and the author of Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam (Metropolitan).                                                     Source:

tags: Obama / Congress / Qaeda / Qaieda / Biden / Israel lobby / 1956 / Israel lobby / AIPAC / Jewish State / 1967 / Jerusalem / Obama Administration / White House / Netanyahu Government / US Policy / East Policy / Eisenhower / Occupied Palestinian Lands / illegal Israel / Israeli Settlements / West Bank / Gaza / Hillary Clinton /
Posted in Palestine , Obama  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
The Petraeus briefing: Biden’s embarrassment is not the whole story
Palestinian Intifada breaks out throughout O. Jerusalem
The Decline of Israel and the Prospects for Peace
Taboo Inhibits Frank Iran/Israel Talk
IOF approves 1600 extra settler homes while Biden talks
Thousands march in Jerusalem rally
New subsidence in Jerusalem's Old City
Jerusalem's Battle of the Graves
Lobby for Gaza in US congress
Losing Patience
Tamimi: IOA plans to seal off Bab Al-Amod in Jerusalem
Members of U.S. Congress Ask President Obama to End the Blockade of Gaza
IOA demolishes Jerusalemite home without prior notice
IOA starts plan to raze Bustan suburb in occupied Jerusalem
The United States, Israel and the Retreat of Freedom
On Gaza Drivers, Rumours and Egypt’s Steel Wall
The US Congressman who sold his soul to the Israel lobby
US Congress Endorses Israeli War Crimes
Congress to weigh in on U.N.'s Gaza report
The Three Branches of the AIPAC: The Executive, the Legislative and the Judicial
Sources: Wiretap Recorded Rep. Harman Promising to Intervene for AIPAC
Regarding Senator Biden and - Tasks from God
From Irgun to AIPAC: Israel Lobby’s US Treasury Follies Hurt
Candidate Biden: U.S., Israel Joined at the Hip
Biden: Israel will be more protected with Obama
AIPAC: We like Biden
Joe Biden: I am a Zionist
Urge Congress, President To Condenn Israeli Attacks On Civilians
AIPAC’s Hold
The Lobby, Unmasked, The AIPAC spy scandal has many tentacles
US vs. AIPAC