Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue927 2022

Last update02:07 AM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Political Islam Studies
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam
Project on Middle East Democracy, January 2010.
Political Islam is the single most active political force in the Middle East today. Its future is intimately tied to that of the region
Saturday, January 30,2010 07:07
by Shadi Hamid and Amanda Kadlec pomed.org


 Full Text (pdf)


Political Islam is the single most active political force in the Middle East today. Its future is intimately tied to that of the region. If the United States and the European Union are committed to supporting political reform in the region, they will need to devise concrete, coherent strategies for engaging Islamist groups. Yet, the U.S. has generally been unwilling to open a dialogue with these movements. Similarly, EU engagement with Islamists has been the exception, not the rule. Where low-level contacts exist, they mainly serve information-gathering purposes, not strategic objectives. The U.S. and EU have a number of programs that address economic and political development in the region – among them the Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI), the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), the Union for the Mediterranean, and the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) – yet they have little to say about how the challenge of Islamist political opposition fits within broader regional objectives. U.S. and EU democracy assistance and programming are directed almost entirely to either authoritarian governments themselves or secular civil society groups with minimal support in their own societies.

The time is ripe for a reassessment of current policies. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, supporting Middle East democracy has assumed a greater importance for Western policymakers, who see a link between lack of democracy and political violence. Greater attention has been devoted to understanding the variations within political Islam. The new American administration is more open to broadening communication with the Muslim world. Meanwhile, the vast majority of mainstream Islamist organizations – including the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Jordan’s Islamic Action Front (IAF), Morocco’s Justice and Development Party (PJD), the Islamic Constitutional Movement of Kuwait, and the Yemeni Islah Party – have increasingly made support for political reform and democracy a central component in their political platforms. In addition, many have signaled strong interest in opening dialogue with U.S. and EU governments.

The future of relations between Western nations and the Middle East may be largely determined by the degree to which the former engage nonviolent Islamist parties in a broad dialogue about shared interests and objectives. There has been a recent proliferation of studies on engagement with Islamists, but few clearly address what it might entail in practice. As Zoé Nautré, visiting fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations, puts it, “the EU is thinking about engagement but doesn’t really know how.”1 In the hope of clarifying the discussion, we distinguish between three levels of “engagement,” each with varying means and ends: low-level contacts, strategic dialogue, and partnership.

Political barriers and misunderstandings on both sides present significant challenges for engagement between Western governments and Islamists. How will pro-Western authoritarian regimes react to such overtures? To what extent can the U.S. and the EU formulate a common policy approach to a thorny, long-standing problem? What obstacles prevent Islamists from engaging with Western governments and to what extent can they be overcome?

To offer insights into these questions, the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) partnered to bring together scholars and experts from the Middle East, the United States, and Europe. Moderated by Nathan Brown, Director of George Washington University’s Institute for Middle East Studies, guests discussed the topic “Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU ‘Trialogue.’” Panelists included Ruheil Gharaibeh, Deputy Secretary-General of Jordan’s IAF; Mona Yacoubian, Special Adviser to the Muslim World Initiative at the United States Institute of Peace; Zoé Nautré, Visiting Fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations; and Shadi Hamid, research director at POMED and Hewlett Fellow at Stanford University’s Center for Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law. This paper draws on the observations and recommendations of the participants.

 Full Text (pdf)


tags: Political Islam / Jihadi Movements / Jihad In Islam / European Neighborhood Policy / Terrorist Attacks Of September 11 / Moderate Islamist / Moderate MB / Moderate Muslim Brotherhood / Engage
Posted in Political Islam Studies , Islamic Movements  
Related Articles
Mauritanian Islamists: Political Islam beyond the War of Ideas
Political Islamic and Jihadi Movements
To take political Islam seriously, the West can’t romanticise it
POMED Notes: Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S., and E.U. Trialogue
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU ’Trialogue’
Is political islam a threat to the west?
Political Islam not a threat to the West
Ikhwanweb Notes: Financial Times Feature on Engaging Political Islam
A seminar about the Many Faces of Political Islam
Political Islam and Muslim hip hop
Political Islam in the Middle East and North Africa
The rise of political Islam
The Many Faces of Political Islam
Political Islam in Egypt
Liberal Islamic Networks in Indonesia: A Counter-Movement to Political Islam
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
The path of centrist political Islam
The Death of Political Islam?
Political Islam: Ready for Engagement?