Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Activites
Rivals Unite to Challenge Mubarak
Rivals Unite to Challenge Mubarak
Politically speaking, Mustafa Naggar, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, and Mohammed Sherif, a self-styled revolutionary socialist, should have little to say to each other
Share with Facebook Facebook Share with Digg Digg Add to Yahoo bookmars Yahoo
Share with Delicious Share with reddit reddit Add to StumbleUpon bookmarks StumbleUpon
Share with Mixx Mixx Add bookmark to Google Google Bookmark and Share
Thursday, April 16,2009 09:20
by Daniel WillIams New York Times

Politically speaking, Mustafa Naggar, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, and Mohammed Sherif, a self-styled revolutionary socialist, should have little to say to each other.

The Brotherhood, the Middle East"s prototype for Islamic-based politics, has long been at odds with those democrats who think religion"s place is in the mosque, not the halls of power.

Still, the two men find common cause in the struggle to end the 27-year reign of Egypt"s president, Hosni Mubarak. Promoting their message through blogs — like hundreds, if not thousands, of other young political activists — they agree that Mr. Mubarak, 80, must go and that Egyptians need to end the historic animosity between Islamists and secular democrats that has bitterly divided Arab politics for a century.

Mr. Naggar, 29, and Mr. Sherif, 23, became acquainted through their Web sites and describe themselves as newly found friends. Interviewed in cafes on opposite sides of Cairo, they displayed remarkably common sentiments, given their distinct roots. "We must reach a middle ground," said Mr. Naggar, a dentist. "We need to understand that to achieve democracy is more important than holding on to old ideologies."

His blog is decorated with an olive branch and often features a photo of someone praying.

"We can"t be always antagonistic," said Mr. Sherif, a government computer technician. "I think democracy can respect the beliefs of the people, so long as the beliefs are not imposed."

His blog is adorned with the clenched socialist fist.

It would be far-fetched to suggest that the two men represent an immediate, concrete threat to Mr. Mubarak"s one-party rule. Nor, for that matter, do they fundamentally challenge the appeal of the Brotherhood—Egypt"s largest opposition force—and its insistence on setting up a theocracy in the Arab world"s most populous country.

Nonetheless, they typify a younger group of Egyptians who challenge the notion that secular democrats and Islamic activists are locked in an immutable struggle.

"It"s important in Egypt that there is such protest activity and that it"s searching for new ideas," said Hala Mustafa, editor of the political journal Democracy Review. "This is a real development, potentially a new generation that is neither just liberal or Islamist."

Mr. Naggar insists his outreach isn"t just a cat"s paw for an Islamic takeover —as occurred in Iran when, after the 1979 fall of the shah, Shiite Islamists under the sway of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini overwhelmed secular democrats and other opposition parties.

"This is not a tactical stand," he said. "It comes from conviction. We meet non-Islamists everywhere, at work and in civil society. At the end of the day, we have to cooperate with everyone."

Mr. Sherif said he wasn"t being naïve. "Of course, there is suspicion on all sides. But why judge an experiment before it really starts?"

Between 1922 and 1952, Islamists and democrats both worked to end British control of Egypt"s finances, civil administration and armed forces. They split over the country"s future, with the Brotherhood, founded in 1928, insisting on an Islamic realm to replace the defunct Ottoman Empire.

Since 1952, when Gamal Abdul Nasser overthrew the monarchy in a coup, Egypt"s three military leaders have encouraged that rivalry, playing one side against the other to weaken both.

Mr. Naggar and Mr. Sherif acknowledge that the chance of short-term change in Egypt is slim. Efforts to bring democracy to Egypt in recent years have failed: Mr. Mubarak never honored his pledges to fosteramultiparty electoral system; small secular parties bickered among themselves and fell short of mobilizing the country"s destitute masses to challenge his rule.

The next parliamentary elections are scheduled for 2010 and presidential elections for 2011. Regulations in place since 2006 virtually ensure that the governing National Democratic Party will dominate. Egypt"s press considers Mr. Mubarak"s son, Gamal — a top leader in the NDP—as the likely successor to his father.

Democratic bloggers have yet to create a cohesive opposition; under emergency laws in force since 1981, it is illegal for more than five people to meet in a political gathering.

Nonetheless, the diffuse movement has attracted government repression. Police detained 500 bloggers during the past year for periods ranging from a few hours to four months, Reporters Without Borders, the Paris-based watchdog group, wrote March 19. No one knows the numbers of political bloggers, the report said, "but that is their strength."

About 20 percent of Egypt"s 83 million people regularly use the Internet, the group estimated. One political Facebook group, the April 6 Youth Movement—which has tried and so far failed to organize nationwide strikes—has more than 76,000 members.

The Brotherhood is monitoring the secular-Islamist contact—and dismisses it. "They can talk all they want; the Brotherhood will not change," the group"s supreme guide, Mohammed Akef, said in an interview. Last fall, the Brotherhood banned a member, Abdel Moneim Mahmoud, from active participation because, among other things, he suggested that strict adherence to the Koran should not be the standard for political action.

With Mr. Akef, 80, set to retire next year, several young Brotherhood members recently called for election of a new leader by all Egyptians, not Brotherhood members in the rest of the Arab world and in Europe, as is traditional. In the interview, Mr. Akef said the process wouldn"t change.

Mr. Naggar and Mr. Sherif both reject Islamic rule in Egypt. "Better to have a civil state with Islamic references," Mr. Naggar said.

"We have to recognize that Egypt is majority Muslim and increasingly religious," Mr. Sherif said.

They say there is a model that might end the destructive division: Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan"s Islamist- rooted Justice and Development Party, which has governed the officially secular state of Turkey since 2002.

"It has been successful in Turkey and would be even more successful in Egypt," Mr. Sherif said. "The party respects the religion of the people but also responds with laws that the people want."

The Source

Posted in Activites , MB Blogs , MB Understanding , Human Rights  
Related Articles
Islamist Parties and Democracy
New Report on Revitalizing U.S. Democracy Promotion
Debating Democracy in the Obama Era
Democracy’s time: a reply to Tarek Osman
Democracy Digest: Event
It was Never about Democracy
How to Promote Democracy?
To Engage or Disengage...That is the Question?
Democracy Promotion in the Aftermath of Iraq
The US can promote democracy, smartly
Democracy-support and the Arab world: after the fall
POMED Notes: Democracy and Conflict
Scholars Urge Obama to Push for Democracy in Middle East
Anxiety And Engagement
Democracy and the Muslim world: the “post-Islamist” turn
Democracy Support in the Middle East
Open Letter to President Obama about Democracy Promotion in the Middle East and the Muslim World
Bi-Partisan Group of Prominent Scholars and Experts Urge President Obama to Make Democracy
Democracy the antidote to jihadist radicalization, task force concludes
Reclaiming The Mantle Of Democracy Promotion
Al Baradie’s Call to the Government to Engage MB
How democracy loses its footing in Middle East
How small steps can pave the way to democracy in the Middle East
Digital Democracy in Chile and Egypt
Democracy ‘normalizes’ Islamists?
Democracy in Palestine
Promoting democracy, not regime change
The Case for Democracy Promotion
A New Wave of Democracy
New Canadian democracy assistance agency on the way
Democracy Promotion in U.S. Foreign Policy
Should liberals promote liberal democracy?
Obama’s win promotes democracy in Arab world
‘Seismic’ economic shifts challenging democracy assistance
Re: The False Hope of Democracy Promotion
Islamist Parties and Democracy: Going Back to the Origins
Major Challenge to Arab Democracy
Funding GONGOs against democracy
Rare Victory for Muslim Democracy
Democracy assistance - what works?
Economic crisis could turn democracy’s stagnation into retreat, report warns
Democracy in Egypt, One Text and Twitter at a Time
Demanding Arab democracy
The Muslim Brotherhood is Pro-Dialogue, Engagement of Women and Copts : Habib
Islamist Pragmatists Ripe for Engagement?
U.S. engages Muslim Brotherhood despite Rice
Engaged to Hamas
To Engage or Not to Engage?
We Must Engage With Moderate Muslims
Political Islam: Ready for Engagement?
Engagement or Quarantine: How to Deal with the Islamist Advance
View from Dubai: Why the West must engage Islamists