Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu93 2020

Last update18:06 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Human Rights
Foreign dictates?
Foreign dictates?
Faced with complaints about its human rights abuses, Egypt is sheltering behind specious arguments about religion and national sovereignty
Monday, January 28,2008 12:55
by Brian Whitaker Guardian

Faced with complaints about its human rights abuses, Egypt is sheltering behind specious arguments about religion and national sovereignty

Unnoticed by most of the world"s news media, a bizarre quarrel has broken out between the EU and the awful Mubarak regime in Egypt.

It began on January 17, when the European parliament approved a resolution criticising human rights abuses in Egypt. In particular, it called on the Egyptian government to end its harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, lift the state of emergency, investigate suspected cases of torture and guarantee the independence of the judiciary.

Compared to what might have been said, this was pretty mild stuff and, as Bahieddin Hassan, director of the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, later remarked, its content was "too true to be refuted".

However, the response from President Mubarak"s National Democratic [sic] party, which - thanks to various electoral shenanigans - has an overwhelming majority in the Egyptian parliament, was one of unmitigated fury. Indeed, it was a classic example of something I discussed in a recent article on Cif, where deadbeat regimes that engage in human rights abuses shelter behind specious arguments about religion, national sovereignty and cultural imperialism.

On this occasion, it was the turn of Fathi Sorour, Egypt"s parliamentary speaker, to mouth the familiar patter about meddling in internal affairs.

"The age of capitulation is over and Egypt no longer accepts the language of foreign dictates," he fumed, threatening to cut all ties with the European parliament.

In the meantime, he would be raising the issue at a meeting of the Union of Muslim Parliaments, which would focus on "Islamophobia in Europe" and "western hostility against Islamic values".

"Egypt is quite capable of opening the scandalous files of human rights abuses in Europe but it will not do this because it respects its historic ties with Europe," he thundered.

No less predictably, other NDP members blamed Israel for the European resolution. Abdel-Ahad Gamaleddin, the ruling party"s parliamentary spokesman, said he suspected Tel Aviv of trying to kill two birds with one stone - embarrass Egypt and distract international attention from Israeli atrocities in Gaza.

This display of verbal fireworks was presumably intended for domestic consumption by the Egyptian press, but the claim that Europe has suddenly embarked on unwarranted meddling in the country"s internal affairs is unbelievably silly.

In 1995, Egypt was one of a dozen non-EU countries - along with 15 EU countries - that voluntarily signed up to the Barcelona Declaration which aims to develop security, stability, trade and cultural cooperation in the Mediterranean region, and also to promote democracy, good governance and human rights. According to al-Ahram Weekly, Egypt receives €30m a year under the Barcelona process, supposedly for the purpose of developing human rights and good governance - so it can hardly complain if other signatories question what is being achieved with the money.

Since 2004, Egypt and the EU have also had an association agreement - one of a series involving Mediterranean countries. These agreements provide important economic benefits but they are not purely about trade; they encompass "cooperation" in many areas, including "political dialogue" and "respect for human rights and democracy".

Again, this was something that the Egyptian government signed of its own accord. Obviously it wanted the economic benefits, but it can"t plead ignorance about the other aspects; they were spelled out in the agreement itself (large pdf file) and the EU has always made clear that "respect for human rights is a fundamental value" of such agreements.

At a joint meeting with Egypt in 2006, the EU explained (pdf) this in more detail:

The EU seeks to work with each partner [in Association Agreements] individually, at the appropriate pace, to achieve a significant degree of economic integration as well as deepening of political cooperation and achieve the objectives of a privileged relationship based on mutual commitment to human rights, including the rights of women and rights of persons belonging to minorities, and to shared values, principally within the fields of the rule of law, good governance and democracy ... The relationship will be shaped by the degree of commitment to these common values and principles ...

As part of this process, eight joint committees were set up, including a political committee that is now the official vehicle for EU-Egyptian dialogue "on concrete human rights issues". This was the context of the European parliament"s resolution on January 17 that got the Egyptian government into such a tizz: it was simply a preparatory step before a meeting of the political committee.

Fortunately, not everyone in Egypt has been fooled by the government"s blustering. Independent MP Gamal Zahran said the European resolution should be regarded "not as interference in internal affairs, but as a warning that the state of human rights in Egypt is becoming an international issue".

One particularly interesting reaction came from Hussein Ibrahim, parliamentary spokesman of the Muslim Brotherhood, which last week saw hundreds of its supporters arrested (yet again).

"The issue of human rights has become a global language," he told al-Ahram Weekly. "Although each country has its own particulars, respect of human rights is now a concern for all peoples" - though he specifically excluded gay rights from that.

Rather than deploring criticism from abroad, he said, the Egyptian government would do better to improve its human rights record - which would then leave less room for foreigners to cause embarrassment.



Posted in Human Rights  
Related Articles
European Parliament Vs. the Egyptian Regime : Clearing the Myth
European Parliament resolution of 17 January 2008 on the situation in Egypt
European Parliament Criticizes Human Rights Situation in Egypt
Egypt’s Human Rights Record
Egypt accuses Europe of discrimination, xenophobia
Egypt rejects EU rights vote
A little detail on Egypt’s issue with the EU
Egypt and EU trade human rights barbs
EU deputies slam Egypt over rights despite Cairo threats
Egypt summons EU envoys
EU lawmakers vow not to yield to Egyptian pressure
Human rights center report: Torture in Egypt is a policy
Political Islam and European Foreign Policy: Perspectives from Muslim Democrats of the Mediterranean
European Parliament: AHRLA Closed Due to Revealing Official Involvement in Torturing
Military Tribunals & Status of Human Rights In Egypt
Human Rights Watch Accuses Egypt of Torturing Detainees
Egyptian Human Rights organizations call for cessation of the police campaign against MB members
On Human Rights, U.S. Seems to Give Egypt a Pass
Qurabi on Syrian Human Rights Situation, Military Tribunal of Egypt’s MB
Qurabi: Human Rights Groups Should Move to Monitor MB Military Court
TV journalist assaulted by plain-clothes police, human rights lawyer prevented from flying to London
France urged to link cooperation with Egypt to better respect for human rights
Egypt Joins Human Rights Council... With More Tortures
Faisal Kutty: Egypt Should Have More Respect to Human Rights
Human Rights Watch Comment on Referring Civilians to Military Courts
MAS Freedom Presents Former U.S. Attorney General at Press Briefing on Human Rights in Egypt
Egypt: Human Rights Watch Asks Mubarak to Investigate Police Brutality
Excerpts of Mr. Akef Speech on Human Right
Cairo Uni. Human Rights Committee Condemns Transferring Scientists to Military Court
Symbolic Protest In DC Against Egypt’s Human Rights Violations
Second Rally Planned in DC Against Egypt’s Human Rights Abuses