Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Sun921 2014

Last update04:15 AM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
Research and Commentary
Foolish Suspicion of Political Islam
Foolish Suspicion of Political Islam
As Arab countries and especially Egypt continue to struggle their way into a new and hopefully more democratic political order, a persistent theme in commentary in the United States about this story has been suspicion of any political actor identified with political Islam.
Monday, January 30,2012 22:41
by PAUL PILLAR National Interest

As Arab countries and especially Egypt continue to struggle their way into a new and hopefully more democratic political order, a persistent theme in commentary in the United States about this story has been suspicion of any political actor identified with political Islam. Some such actors warrant such suspicion. There is, for example, Abdel Hakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli military council in Libya. Belhadj is also a founding member of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which the United States still officially lists as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. Belhadj stresses his focus on overthrowing Muammar Qaddafi's regime, but his career as an international jihadist has involved violent activities elsewhere, especially South Asia. Someone like Belhadj deserves suspicion—not because he is Islamist but because of his history.


Now consider the history of the political Islamist actor that probably is receiving more attention than any other these days: the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. That history is one of decades of remarkable forbearance and endurance in the face of different degrees of repression by different Egyptian regimes. The Brotherhood has a long record of commitment to nonviolence—a record that has made it the target of vehement denunciation by the likes of al-Qaeda. What is there about the Brotherhood, beyond its Islamist coloration, that should make it any more the object of suspicion than other parties, movements and groups vying for influence in a new Egypt? How else should it have behaved to make us less suspicious?


Ask also why parties such as the Brotherhood (or more properly, the Freedom and Justice Party, which is the Brotherhood's political arm) that have an Islamic identity should be viewed differently from parties with some other religious identity. Christian democratic parties have been an accepted part of the political mainstream in many European countries. How are Christian democratic parties different from Muslim democratic ones? It is easy to think of religiously identified political parties that have caused problems—for stability, for sound policy and for democracy itself—but they are not just Islamist ones. In important respects, the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in India, for example, has not been good news for peaceful communal relations in that country, just as some religiously identified Jewish parties in Israel have not been good news for any hope of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


David Pollock of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy had an opinion piece in the Washington Post on Friday that exemplifies the automatic suspicion that gets directed at a group such as Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, which is the subject of his article. Pollock wants to warn us about falling for what he describes as “new signs of moderation” by the Brotherhood, which is a misleading formulation by Pollock given that what is new is not the direction of the Brotherhood but instead the political environment in which it is now operating. The main substance of the piece involves comparing what the Brotherhood says on Arabic and English language versions of its websites. Some subjects that get significant attention on one version do not on the other. There are not inconsistencies, just differences in attention and emphasis. Pollock concedes that “some might note that all political parties, to at least an extent, engage in mixed messaging.” Well, that's for sure. In fact, the Brotherhood's mixed messaging that he describes seems pretty mild compared to, say, Republican candidates' English and Spanish language advertising in Florida.


Read the rest of the Article 
 

tags: Political Islam / Egypt / Arab Countries / United States / Libya / Qaeda / Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood / Egyptian Regime / Tripoli / Freedom and Justice Party / European Countries / Washington Post
Posted in Research and Commentary  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Political Islam and Democracy, by German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle
How political Islam is winning the war for talent (and gaining a competitive edge)
Understanding political Islam
Al-Ittihad al-Islamiyya and Political Islam in Somalia
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU 'Trialogue'
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU ‘Trialogue’
POMED Report: “Strategies for Engaging Political Islam”
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam
Mauritanian Islamists: Political Islam beyond the War of Ideas
Political Islamic and Jihadi Movements
To take political Islam seriously, the West can’t romanticise it
POMED Notes: Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S., and E.U. Trialogue
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU ’Trialogue’
Is political islam a threat to the west?
Is political Islam a threat to the west?
Political Islam not a threat to the West
Ikhwanweb Notes: Financial Times Feature on Engaging Political Islam
A seminar about the Many Faces of Political Islam
Political Islam and Muslim hip hop
Political Islam in the Middle East and North Africa