Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Fri725 2014

Last update20:11 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
Research and Commentary
PBS Interview with Shadi Hamid: Why Is America Reaching Out to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood?
PBS Interview with Shadi Hamid: Why Is America Reaching Out to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood?
As the final results of Egypt’s parliamentary elections come in this week, the country’s Islamists are walking away the biggest winners.
Saturday, January 7,2012 22:17
by Azmat Khan pbs

As the final results of Egypt’s parliamentary elections come in this week, the country’s Islamists are walking away the biggest winners.


The Muslim Brotherhood’s projected 40 percent electoral victory brings an added benefit – international legitimacy, enhanced recently by reports that the U.S., which had long formally shunned the Islamist group, is now engaging with it. Al-Nour, a Salafi political block of more hardline and ultraconservative Islamists, also did unexpectedly well, taking about 25 percent of the vote in preliminary counts.


FRONTLINE talked to Shadi Hamid, Director of Research at the Brookings Institution’s Doha Center and a fellow at its Saban Center for Middle East Policy, to explore what’s behind the latest U.S. efforts to engage with the Brotherhood, and what’s at stake – for both the U.S. and the Brotherhood – with the Salafis’ unanticipated success.


 

What kind of U.S.-Brotherhood engagement is happening right now and how significant or unprecedented is this contact?


We shouldn’t overstate the degree of engagement. It’s still fairly limited at this point. It’s just a couple meetings here and there.


But as recently as October, [U.S. Ambassador to Egypt] Ann Patterson was quoted as saying that she personally wasn’t comfortable meeting with members of Muslim Brotherhood. That’s pretty concerning. And I think that’s illustrative of where the U.S. has been and the challenges it’s going to face. …


Today, the U.S. still hasn’t worked out a coherent policy toward Islamist parties in the region, and maybe they don’t want to. There’s no grand strategic vision. It’s one thing to meet a couple leaders of the Brotherhood every other month; I think it’s another to have a substantive strategic dialogue. I think the latter is what’s necessary, but the former is what we have right now. So the question for U.S. policymakers is what are the objectives for engagement? What does this all lead to?


Why now? What factors are at play in these more public contacts with the Brotherhood right now?


The [parliamentary] elections are the big difference here. The results are in and they’re unmistakable: They have confirmed that the Muslim Brotherhood will be the dominant political player in Egypt for the foreseeable future — and this could be 20 or 30 years or God knows how long. It’s going to take a considerable period of time for liberals to ever replace Islamists in that respect. …


I think that reality is now dawning on U.S. policy-makers in a very serious way. The Brotherhood is a fact on the ground, and you have to find a way to work with it, to talk with it. The U.S. is now forced to try to find a way to co-exist with the Brotherhood. It requires a mental shift on the part of U.S. policy-makers.


But I don’t think we should give the Obama administration too much credit on this. They should have been doing this earlier, because anyone who was watching Egypt knew that the Brotherhood was going to be the most important player in a democratic Egypt regardless.


If the U.S. was really ahead of the curve it would have been engaging with the Brotherhood in 2005 [when candidates affiliated with the group won 20 percent of the vote in the country's parliamentary elections]. That way there could have actually been an established relationship between them, an established degree of trust.


But now they’re starting from square one, and it’s going to take time to build and develop that relationship.  It’s never going to happen overnight, considering how much mistrust there is between the two sides historically.


Is American frustration with Egypt’s military a driving force in this engagement?


I don’t think it’s a driving force, but it’s a part of it.


The more the U.S. engages with the Brotherhood, the more it sends a message to the military that it’s willing to diversify its alliances and relationships. The military has been banking on the notion that the U.S. is kind of in its pocket because the U.S. is afraid of Islamists coming to power and for that reason it’s going to support the military to counterbalance the Islamists.

 


Is the rise of the Salafis an impetus at all for the U.S. to engage with the Brotherhood? Could there be a “good Islamist vs. bad Islamist” factor at play?


Even if U.S. policymakers don’t like the Brotherhood, the Brotherhood looks a lot better head to head [with] the Salafis.


The Brotherhood was always thought to be the right wing of Egyptian politics — I think incorrectly, but that was the perception. Now it’s very clear that the Brotherhood is not the right wing. It’s a center-right political force; that’s it. It’s the Salafis who are the far right populists. …


The Brotherhood takes no positions that are radical by Egyptian standards. The vast majority of Egyptians believe that Sharia should play a major role in political life. The vast majority of Egyptians believe in implementing specific aspects of Sharia law. The Dec. 2010 Pew Poll, which you can take with a grain of salt, is illustrative of broader trends: 77 percent of Egyptian respondents said they believe in cutting off the hands of thieves, and 82 percent said they support the stoning of adulterers.


So I think people miss the real story in Egypt. People were trying to convince themselves during the revolution that Egyptians were going to turn out to be a bunch of fluffy liberals. Americans were projecting a lot of their own desires onto Egyptians. They said, “Wow look, here are these young liberal revolutionaries who use Facebook and Twitter.” I think there’s something very patronizing about that. … At some point you have to respect the will of the people. They like Salafis, to some extent, and they like the Brotherhood to a great extent.

Read the Rest of the Article on PBS

 

tags: Muslim Brotherhood / Egypt / Parliamentary Elections / Islamists / Middle East / Sharia / Revolution / Liberals / Facebook / Salafi / Al-Nour / Democratic Egypt / Shadi Hamid / Obama Administration
Posted in Research and Commentary  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Muslim Brotherhood to Help Protect Churches During New Year Celebrations
Muslim Brotherhood Spokesman: Safeguarding Freedoms a Top Priority
Islamists Vow Support for Egypt Economy
The Muslim Brotherhood's New Power In Egypt's Parliament
Muslim Brotherhood: Transferring Power from SCAF Should Take Place after Formation of Constitutional Bodies
Why Islamists Are Better Democrats
Egypt’s Democracy: Between the Military, Islamists, and Illiberal Democrats
Muslim Brotherhood party addresses the poor in first popular conference - Politics - Egypt - Ahram Online
Joining a Dinner in a Muslim Brotherhood Home
Political Activist Wael Ghonim: Fear of Islamists Coming to Power 'Exaggerated'
Sayed Darwish: Muslim Brotherhood Encourages Art and Creativity
Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood and ruling military: Deal or no deal?
Muslim Brotherhood: SCAF's Nondemocratic Measures Must Be Withheld
Akef: Egypt's Revival is Goal of Muslim Brotherhood and “Freedom and Justice”
FJP Leader Urges Egyptian Islamists Practice Politics and "Rationalize" Their Discourse
It's obvious, go talk to the Islamists
How is Islam the Solution?: Constitutional Visions of Contemporary Islamists
Why are Islamists Popular?
When Islamists Go into Politics