Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Wed1217 2014

Last update11:07 AM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Opinions > Other Opinions
Israel’s Netanyahu undoubted winner of US mid-term elections – for now
Israel’s Netanyahu undoubted winner of US mid-term elections – for now
Uri Avnery argues that although the Republican win in the US mid-term elections represents a victory for Binyamin Netanyahu, the longer term prospects for the Israeli prime minister and those he represents are much less certain.
Sunday, November 7,2010 18:55
by Uri Avnery redress.cc

 ... The Israeli leadership did not know how to treat the results of this election. Are they good for the Jews or bad for the Jews?

The big winner of the American election is none other than Binyamin Netanyahu.

His policy is similar to that of his political mentor, Yitzhak Shamir. It is based on the Jew who had to teach the Polish nobleman’s horse to read and to write within a year – otherwise the whole shtetel would be massacred. “A year is a long time,” he tried to soothe his weeping wife, “Within a year the horse or the nobleman will be dead.”

Shamir’s game was to postpone everything, miss every opportunity to bring peace closer, gain time.

“In domestic matters, which decide elections, he [Obama] will not be able to achieve anything without a compromise with the reinvigorated Republicans. These are led by politicians who are abject lackeys of Israel.”

When the pressure on Israel gets stronger, one has to evade, obstruct, cheat. Sooner or later the nobleman or the horse will die – and with some luck, both of them. The situation will change, the pressure will lessen, those who exert the pressure will disappear. A crisis somewhere else in the world will take people’s minds off us. We shall win another year or two, and then we shall see.

This is Netanyahu’s strategy, too. To prevent any advance towards peace, since peace means the evacuation of settlements and the setting up of a Palestinian state.

For two years now he has succeeded in thwarting every effort by Barack Obama to compel him to start a real peace process. He has defeated him at every turn, time after time. Now Obama has suffered a stinging setback at home, and a new chapter has begun.

But the nobleman has not died, and neither has the horse. How will Obama treat Netanyahu now?

In Jerusalem, there are two contradictory answers to this question.

The first assessment is that there is nothing to fear anymore from Obama. True, the horse has not died, but it is limping badly.

A big question mark is now hanging over Obama’s future. He is in danger of becoming a one-term president. From now on, he will be compelled to devote all his time and energy to his effort to get re-elected. In such a situation, he cannot afford to provoke the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and run the risk of losing the votes – and the money – of the Jews.

 AIPAC: The Voice of America – Part 1  The Orange and the Pea
? 
AIPAC: The Voice of America – Part 2  The Treasonous Dollar Drain
? 
Treason by Members of the United States Congress

According to this assessment, when the House of Representatives is in the hands of his opponents, Obama must be very careful. In domestic matters, which decide elections, he will not be able to achieve anything without a compromise with the reinvigorated Republicans. These are led by politicians who are abject lackeys of Israel.

In short: there is nothing to fear anymore. Obama can make gestures towards the Palestinians and even flex his muscles, but in any real test with Netanyahu and AIPAC he will be the first to blink.

That assures Netanyahu two years of quiet. Everything will remain frozen, except the settlements. They will grow. And in two years, with a new president in the White House, we shall see what we shall see. A new noblemen, a new horse.

The contrary assessment is much less rosy for Netanyahu.

No doubt, Obama is full of fury against Netanyahu, and this fury may by now have turned into real loathing. In the last days before this election, Netanyahu refused Obama the little victory that could have improved his image at the last moment. Obama asked – nay, begged – for nothing more than a freeze of the settlements for another two months, just to make it possible to stage a grand spectacle of the resumption of the ceremony of the peace process. Netanyahu turned down the request disdainfully, even though it was accompanied by the offer of a
huge political bribe.

Obama is a man who does not show negative emotions. He will continue to smile at Netanyahu, perhaps even to slap him on the back. But an enemy in the White House is a dangerous enemy, and a wounded enemy is even more dangerous. Wounded or not, an American president is still the most powerful person in the world.

True, the coming presidential election is already casting a long shadow over Washington. But the beginning of the serious election campaign is still a year off, and this year may be an opportunity for a determined American peace initiative. The president may want to show his voters an impressive achievement in the international arena, and a historic peace agreement between Israel and Palestine would certainly constitute such an achievement.

And even if this does not come about, a more serious danger for Netanyahu may be lurking after November 2012. Obama may be re-elected. Some of his predecessors – Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton – suffered stinging setbacks in their first mid-term elections and still had no problem getting re-elected.

“If Obama is elected for a second term, he may become a very dangerous adversary indeed. Since he will not be allowed to stand again, he will be immune to the pressure of the Israel lobby. He will be thinking about his place in history.”

If Obama is elected for a second term, he may become a very dangerous adversary indeed. Since he will not be allowed to stand again, he will be immune to the pressure of the Israel lobby. He will be thinking about his place in history. And undoubtedly, making peace between Israel and Palestine would be a historic achievement.

Moreover, the Tea Party may disappear as quickly as it appeared. This happens in the US every few decades: a wave of madness sweeps over the country like a tsunami and disappears as if it had never been. Remember Joe McCarthy. If the wave continues until 2012, and Obama then faces somebody like Sarah Palin, he could ask for nothing better.

As to the Congress, as far as Israel is concerned, there is no change. The senators and congressmen dance to the tune of the Israel lobby, and in this respect there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans. It “crosses party lines”, as one of the leaders of the lobby recently boasted.

In short, according to this assessment the clash between Obama and Netanyahu is inevitable. It will come to a head within two or three years, maximum. The nobleman will not die, nor will the horse...

This personal clash hides a far deeper, far more fundamental one.

There is a lot of blabber about the partnership of the two countries. About the joint myths of pioneers, fight against the natives, conquest of a new homeland, a nation of immigrants. About “joint values”.

It all reminds me of Shimon Peres’s blabbering in the 1950s about the “joint values” that bound France to Israel. The joint values evaporated the moment France made peace with the Algerian rebels. The French stance changed overnight. As Charles de Gaulle said: “France has no friends; France has only interests.”

“Both in the State Department and in the Pentagon, the experts know that the present Israeli policy is contrary to the American national interest.”

The United States of America, too, has interests, and their friendships, too, are temporary. Both in the State Department and in the Pentagon, the experts know that the present Israeli policy is contrary to the American national interest. This knowledge finds expression in a growing number of books by former senior officials and academics, as well as in the speeches of senior military officers...

The US is involved in two expensive wars in Muslim countries – Iraq and Afghanistan – and in a severe crisis with a third Muslim country – Iran. All over the “extended Middle East”, its allies are declining, while its opponents are in the ascendency.

The opponents are a mixed lot: Iran is a religious Shi’i country, Turkey is a Sunni secular republic (with a moderately religious party in power), Syria is a Sunni country ruled by the small Alawite sect, whose Islamic credentials are doubted by both Sunnis and Shi’is. Hezbollah is strictly Shi’i, Hamas is strongly Sunni. There is not much all these have in common, except their opposition to the status quo in the region.

Almost all the experts believe that the unlimited American support for Israel is the main cause for the Islamic anti-American wave. Most of them do not speak about this openly, because fear of the Israeli lobby pervades the entire American political establishment. But even the most terrifying lobby cannot withstand, in the long run, the inexorable logic of national interests.

There is something crazy in this situation: our government is rushing light-heartedly towards a clash with the only remaining ally we have in the world. No realistic alternative can be detected on the horizon...


 

Source: Redress Information & Analysis (http://www.redress.cc). Material published on Redress may be republished with full attribution to Redress Information & Analysis (http://www.redress.cc)

tags: Netanyahu / Peace / Settlements / Palestinian / Obama / Jerusalem / AIPAC / Politicians / Washington / Palestine / Israel Lobby / United States / Iraq Afghanistan / Middle East / Syria / Hezbollah / Hamas / American Election / White House / Clinton / Pentagon
Posted in Other Opinions , Palestine  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Netanyahu in Washington next week, no meeting with Obama scheduled
Erdogan says wont attend climate conference if Netanyahu attends
His father’s boy: the three faces of Binyamin Netanyahu
Netanyahu declines Obama's request to expand settlement freeze
Netanyahu calls for resuming settlement activities quietly
Binyamin Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas: what are the possibilities?
Netanyahu rejects any preconditions for direct talks
Kadima: Netanyahu not serious about peace talks with Fatah
Netanyahu threatens to escalate military attacks on Gaza
Netanyahu refuses to extend settlement freeze
Spanish activists sue Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders
Netanyahu: I deceived US to destroy Oslo accords
Hamas: Netanyahu wants to relieve Shalit-related pressure on him
Netanyahu: Israel wont appologize to Turkey
Attorney General investigates Netanyahu’s arrest complaint
Prosecutor General forms committee to investigate complaints against Netanyahu
The Hypocrisy Of Netanyahu
Netanyahu will be pleased. Now UK has an upper-class coalition “fagging” for Israel
Netanyahu gov't: Building in Jerusalem to continue
Netanyahu and Mubarak continue talks despite opposition in Egypt.