Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Fri1219 2014

Last update05:31 AM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Opinions > Other Opinions
A Western strategy towards the Islamic Movements
A Western strategy towards the Islamic Movements
However, the Western policy’s views towards the Islamic movement changes according to the view of policy makers who seek the most appropriate means to achieve the aims of the Western foreign policy. It is evident that the Islamic movement is not desired by the West which views it as a threat which must be kept under control in order to not affect targets of the western foreign policy.
Thursday, July 9,2009 00:47
by Rafik Habib IkhwanWeb

How will the West deal with the Islamic movements in the coming stages?  Although there is a state of hesitation and confusion in the western attitudes towards the Islamic movement  we see a transitional stage in the Western policy towards Islamic movements. That given, this Western policy can be relatively different for brief  periods of time. There is no consistent or long-term strategy for the Western treatment of the Islamic movement. The Western policy is mainly seeking to protect Western interests in the Arab and Muslim regions. This can be ascertained through the political hegemony and the securing of the Israeli occupation state and the alliance of the ruling elite in the region with the West.
 
 
However, the Western policy’s views towards the Islamic movement changes according to the view of policy makers who seek the most appropriate means to achieve the aims of the Western foreign policy. It is evident that the Islamic movement is not desired by the West which views it as a threat which must be kept under control in order to not affect targets of the western foreign policy.
 
 In George Bush Jr"s term, especially after 9/11 attacks, the Western policy placed the entire Islamic movement in the same basket; as being the foremost enemy of the West. When it was revealed that this policy aggravated a state of disagreement, confrontation and hostility among a broad sector of the public, it started to differentiate between extremist and moderate movements dealing with each according to their classification. This spawned outlines of a Western strategy that gradually took shape in dealing with the Islamic movements.

 
Restructuring the Islamic Case
  The western party initially tries to be an effective element in forming the Islamic case, so that it can influence this case from within the country or abroad. It eventually lead to an essential change in the map of the Islamic situation and in the trends of Islamic movements. Western policy makers definitely realize it is difficult to affect Islamic movements, but Western attitudes show concepts and models for the Islamic movement and exercises pressure on any movement to determine its attitude towards these Western models,  the Islamic movement accordingly have only to either declare itself an ally or enemy to the West. However, there is a variety of models, which are based mainly on the Islamic movement"s position on the map of the Muslim and Arab Region, spawning various substitutes inside the category of allies and enemies.
 
 
The Western policy is seemingly dealing with various models, without restricting itself to the narrow category of friend or foe. The following are several representations highlighted by Western policies.
 
 1-The Islamic enemy:

This category consists of Al-Qaeda network and Taliban Movement in Afghanistan, along with the Taliban Pakistani Movement. It is apparent from the western backed policy of President Barak Obama that this category constitutes the arch rival of the United States and the West. Any anti-US militant movement that may also oppose the US-allied ruling regimes is listed in this category. The war that Pakistani government launches against Taliban Pakistan Movement has no connection with what happened in 11/9/2001.  It is reported that the Taliban Pakistani Movement supports the Taliban Movement in Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda network. However that does not justify the expanding of the war in Pakistan in such a way that it may trigger a civil war. This war was actually launched against anti-US Jihadist movements who fight US allies in the region. This defines the differences of the two categories of enemies that fight using weapon, and of terrorism, in a category that can be expanded to include others.
 
2-Secularist allies with Islamic roots: This category consists of any Islamic movement or Islamic figures that give a political platform or rhetoric under a secularist front, assuming that secularism is the optimum standard of democracy and human rights in the western mindset. Any secularist approach on the political and public levels is consistent with the Western understanding of politics, despite their being cultural and ethical differences. Islamists who offer a platform that embraces the secularist criterion of the modern state is actually committed to the Western conditions of politics where the cultural differences reflect the cultural and moral differences accepting Western political models with special features suitable for the varying local environments. An example of this model is the Turkish Justice and Development Party (AKP) which constitutes a secular party founded by Islamists or so called: "A party with Islamic roots", not with an Islamic source of authority. This is an example of a movement that can have an alliance with the West, unlike the Islamic enemy.

 
3-Islamists allying to fight extremism:
1.     This consists where special conditions require the sealing of alliances with an Islamic party without imposing g unjust conditions for the purpose of confronting another Islamic party. This is what happened in Somalia, where the West allied with a party of the Islamic Courts Movement that ruled Somalia for a few months, against another party in the same movement, the Islamic Courts movement. This resulted in the confrontation between the West-backed Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed as a president of Somalia, and his friend in the Islamic Courts Movement Taher Awes. Definitely, Sherif Sheikh Ahmed wasn"t promoting secularism.  They also allowed him to request the applying of the Islamic Sharia and he was given a liberty to fight the Islamic opposition. In this we face an Islamic ruling and an Islamic opposition. We observe that the Western policy is based on getting rid of "an extremist movement" with a movement that the west perceive as more moderate. We even anticipate a tragic end for such an approach, resembling the end of the movements of Mujahideen in Afghanistan.
 
If the power allied with Sherif Sheikh Ahmed managed to eliminate the so called extremist movements which are seen as embracing the ideology of Al-Qaeda network and its leader Osama bin Laden, Western powers will oppose it in an attempt to eliminate it as well and search for a secular ally, unless they find a secular tendency from Islamist Sheikh Sherif Sheikh Ahmed. This occurred with Afghan militants as they faced a confrontation from those who were formerly among them after the end of their role in the war against Former Soviet Union. This was, assumed to be the starting spark for Al-Qaeda under the leadership of Osama bin Laden to wage the war on America.  In addition to this other different forms of accepting Islamic movements for specific purposes, similar to that of the Iraqi Islamic Party took place in return for its participating in the political process under US occupation of Iraq.
 
4-Accepting an Israeli price:
 
This approach appears in the resistance movements in Palestine and Lebanon.  The Hamas movement is asked to adopt policies that secure the existence of an Israeli occupational state in return for recognizing the movement, recognizing its political role, and allowing it to share power. This is a bargain between the resistance and the recognition of the movement which is in fact a compromising of all constituents of the movement and the constituents of the Palestinian people. Therefore, those bargains and compromises will not succeed because what they ask of the Hamas movement or Hezbollah is in fact a pact with suicide for them. If the Hamas movement abandoned its constituents, the movement will disappear and leaving a void to be filled by another movement.
 
The problem here is that: The West thinks that what happened with secular struggle movements can happen with Islamic resistance movements, which is wrong. Secular struggle movements can adopt settlements, and change their constituents of their struggle because these constituents are only political views, but the beliefs of Islamic resistance movements which are religious and cultural constituents, elements that the nation can"t restrict or change. Therefore, we see that western policy will move in a vicious cycle with the Islamic resistance movements. It will hold dialogues with them, however without reaching final understandings. This means that the dialogue with Islamic resistance movements is only a means for opening ways for a temporary understanding with the resistance, as being a status quo that can"t be disregarded. Therefore a dialogue will be maintained with those movements to gradually soften their attitudes, in the hope that this may eventually lead to important changes.
 
5-Keeping away from power:
 
An example of this case is the Muslim Brotherhood movement, present in several Arab and Muslim countries, especially in Egypt, where we find that the western policy does not want any Islamic movement to reach power.. Any Islamic movement that has an Islamic platform becomes unacceptable as alliances with the West. However, the West does not want to open all fronts of confrontation and conflict with all of the Islamic parties. Therefore, we see that the attitude towards the Muslim Brotherhood group, can"t be secularized, nonetheless it is not ready to change its attitude towards the Israeli occupation state- which it sees as an illegitimate entity. It also calls for a unified State of Palestine; we see that this attitude will move towards controlling its outside power, as an alternative for confrontation and exclusion. The Western policy will focus on not allowing the Muslim Brotherhood movement to reach power, and by allowing it to live and seeing its presence, activity and effect as an inevitable fait accompli.
 
According to the above mentioned movements, Islamic movements are listed as the militant enemy, the secularist ally, the temporary moderate Islamic ally facing Islamic extremism, the resistant Islamic power which wishes to change its attitude, and the Islamist who is being kept away from power as long as it can"t be secularized. The most important thing in this concept is that it has no principle, as it may change from time to time. It also widens gaps between the Islamic movements, and deals with them starting from giving them the carrot of power for those accepting secularization as a political ceiling and the stick of the military force against those fighting US hegemony or fighting US allies in the region. The aim is to widen the gap and even cause schism among Islamic movements, in a way that may trigger confrontations among them, causing these movements to get involved in proxy wars for the West.
 
The most complicated point is the dialogue with the Islamic resistance movements in Palestine , especially  the Hamas movement. Holding a dialogue with it aims at exercising pressure on it to recognize the legitimacy of Israel as a Jewish state, and denounce the resistance which they call "violence and terrorism". This is impossible. Therefore, the results of the dialogues with the resistance movements will remain an important and effective factor in the Western attitudes towards the Islamic movement in general and they may even lead to changing Western policies towards them.
 
Egyptian researcher
 


Posted in Other Opinions , Islamic Movements  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Hamdan: Hamas-Carter meet reflects West’s conviction that Hamas can’t be ignored
The Muslim Brotherhood
Bani Ershaid: Jordan’s Islamic movement committed to democratic practices
Somali Islamic Movement Condemns Piracy As Criminal Act
Qaradawi: I Supported Obama For Change
Europe’s Muslims Urge Obama "Overcome the Mistakes of the Past"
Islamic Movement in Nigeria: When Groups, Orders, Sects Meet
Scholars urge Islamic movements a rethink
US Leaders Recommend Muslim Diplomacy
Islamic Movements Expert Says Al-Qaeda Call For Killing Him Is as “very serious” and extremist.
Opposition Alliances and Democratization in Egypt
The West and the Islamists
Dialogue Between Muslim Brotherhood and EU Has Better Prospects, Says MB Deputy Chairman
Intellectual and Organization in Islamic Movement, A Tense Relation
Bush’s speech to Dafus Economic Forum is “Provocative”, says MB MP
The EU, Israel and Hamas
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
Al Qaeda to Iran
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
Hamas: Zionist enemy lost its mind
Habib: Muslim Brotherhood is Not Anti-American
The Power of Nightmares - Part I, Part 2, Part 3
Political Islam and European Foreign Policy: Perspectives from Muslim Democrats of the Mediterranean
Muslim Brotherhood Meetings
Political Islam and US foreign policy
Dilemma of US Attitude towards the Muslim Brotherhood
Political Islam and The Future of Democracy in the Middle East
Will an "Islamic Reformation" Ever Come?
Is “Brotherhood” with America Possible?*
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood: Political Islam Without al-Qaeda
Young Brothers in Cyberspace
MERIP 245: Politics of Youth
U.S. engages Muslim Brotherhood despite Rice
Stop blaming West for woes: Muslim scholar
Looking for Moderate Islamists
Engaging Hamas and Hezbollah
UK Conference: Only Solution for Egypt’s Democracy Crisis is MB Participation
Ramsey Clark in Cairo to Monitor MB Military Trial
George Ishak Asks About MB Leaders View to Rule Inheritance Issue
Islamism, democracy and political violence in the Arab World: The Hamas challenge
Letters: Engaging the Muslim Brotherhood
Aboul-Fotouh: Interfaith Dialogue Should Handle Moral, Humanitarian Issues, not Creed Issues
MB responds to Marc Lynch’s Memo Published in Foreign Policy
Nestor: Western Governments Don’t Back Trials against MB Leaders
Doing dialogue in Cairo
Youssef: European Parties Seek Political Space for Hamas in the West
Separating Islam from Political Islam:The Case of Morocco
Early Islamist responses to Western challenge
After political Islam?
Perceptions of identity: Islamist identity and neoconservatism
Military Hegemony Does Not A Democracy Make
Do not undermine moderate Islamists: The case of Muslim Brotherhood leader, Khayrat El-Shater
The Myth of Moroccan Democracy
Democracy, not terror, is the engine of political Islam
Democracy under siege
U.S. Democracy Promotion During and After Bush
Engaged to Hamas
New version of political Islam
A Response to Western Views of Islamist Movements
European Union officials hold secret talks with Hamas
Memo to the MB: How to talk to America?
Hamas is ready to talk
Aboul-Fotouh: We Welcome Serious Dialogue For Our National Interests
Abu Zuhri: We Welcome Call for Dialogue with West
’Britian should talk to Hamas’
To Engage or Not to Engage?
Dialogue With The Islamists
The West Should Push Mubarak on Reform
Islamic Movements at the End of the 20th Century
The Political Dialogue of the Moslem Brotherhood
For Democratic Change, Deal with Moderate Islamists
The West and Moderate Islam
Washington to Ask Egypt to Find a Legal Framework in Dealing with the Muslim Brotherhood
Brotherhood seeks to calm fears and establish dialogue with Copts
Banned Islamic Movement Now the Main Opposition in Egypt
Egypt’s Brothers open to dialogue with US Congress(Reuters)
On the U.S./Islamists Dialogue, The Americans must thoroughly know who they’re talking to…
El-Arian: the Brotherhood’s MPs Deal with any Government
Past and present of political Islam
The Brotherhood and the West; Has Time Come for reconciliation?
The West And Moderate Islamism
Political Islam
Pope Shenouda Urges Muslim "Lobby" in The West
Political Islam’s Opportunity in Jordan
The Challenge of Democracy In the Muslim World
Is political Islam on the march?
The West Abandons the Push For Democracy In The Arab World
The Price of Not Talking to Hamas
Western Union Profiles Muslim Names
Islamic Movement Leaderships condemn Israeli Brutalities Against Palestine and Lebanon
Statement of Islamic Movements’ Leaders Condemning Israel
The Islamists & Their Alternative Vision of Modernization and Globalization
Radical Islamists and Western Governments
This is just the start of a showdown between the West and The Rest
Jordanian Islamic Movement Women Stage Anti Aggression Rally
Bush’s Belief in a Worldwide Islamist Conspiracy is Foolish and Dangerous
In Mideast, a wave of political Islam
We Must Engage With Moderate Muslims
Political Islam takes centre stage since 9-11
Adams urges world community to open dialogue with Hamas
Future of Political Islam in Tunisia
Islam and the West: a historical background
A new American Report: Islamists overrun Elections in Morocco
Political Islam: Ready for Engagement?
Has the West been silenced by Islam?
Losing ’Hope And Faith’ In The West
Islamic-safe finance grows in the West
Political Islam: An Exercise In Mutual Listening
VEIL DEBATE: WEST’S DEFINITION OF FREEDOM BIASED SAYS MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD
Engaging Moderate Muslims—Really?
Main Challenges Facing Islamic Movements In Recent History
Political Islam and Regime Survival in Egypt
Ahmed Zewail: The West and Islam need not be in conflict
Why Attempts To deal with Western biases failed?!
Noticeable Progress for Islamic Movement in Mauritanian Elections
Europe Is Growing Skeptical Of Dialogue With Muslims
The Rise of Political Islam
What the West Can Learn From Islam
Interview with Dr. Issam el-Arian
Fotoh: West Must Not Pressure Regimes To Curb Islamists
Interview With Dr. Abdel Monem Abul-Futouh
Engagement or Quarantine: How to Deal with the Islamist Advance
Islamist Political Parties in Kuwait and Morocco
The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood
Strategic Thinking about the Muslim Brotherhood
The Rise of Islamists in the Middle East
"Culture Should Not Be Restricted to the West"
View from Dubai: Why the West must engage Islamists
Anti-globalists reach out to Islamists
Essam El-Erian: Dialogue Is A Foundation of Our Movement
MB Is Not Opposed To Dialogue With US Despite Reservations
Islamist diversity is al-Qaeda’s enemy
How North African Nations Are Dealing With Islamist Resurgence
Facts About Washington’s Conference on Arab Islamic Movements
Facts Over Washington’s Conference on Arab Islamic Movements
’Brotherhood’ Blogs In Egypt Offer View Of Young Islamists
Democracy Sure, but on Whose Terms
Habib: MB Adopts Democracy, Rejects Revolutions
What real democracy doesn’t look like
Turkey tests Islamist appetite for democracy
The Price of democracy
Jordan Islamists met with US democracy experts
Help Our Fight for Real Democracy
Dialogues of Companions
Measuring Efficacy of Democracy Promotion
Will promoting democracy backfire?
The Democrats’ Democracy Problem
Georgetown Symposium on Islamist Politics
US Considering Engaging Muslim Brothers?
The desecration of democracy
Should America Fear Middle East Democracy?
Ten reasons to talk to Hamas
Islamists: To Deal, or Not To Deal?
Democracy Works - Only Very Slowly
Morocco’s Islamists Are Slowly Winning
Egypt—Don’t Give Up on Democracy Promotion
Why Discuss Democracy?
Turkey: Islamists pay a price for victory
Turkey’s AK victory shows that Islamism and democracy can be reconciled
The United States talks to Islamists. So what?
Should the West dialogue with Islamists?
Engaging Political Islam to Promote Democracy
More Expert Voices on Political Islamists and the Dangers of Current Policy
Controversy Among Reformists in the Arab World Over Dialogue With Islamist Groups
Hamas Political Quake, its Effect on Mideast Islamic Movements
Katatny: Dialogue Between Islamists And The West a Necessity
Dialogue manifisto Between Islamists And The West
El-Shater: We Do Not Promote An Anti Western Agenda
Cairo: MB And US Embassy Deny Dialogue
What Islamists Need to Be Clear About: The Case of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood
Bush’s crusade to bring democracy to the Middle East is resulting in strengthening militant Islam
An interview with George Giacaman about political Islam
Future of Democracy in the Arab World
Egypt, values ride a Mideast-West seesaw
Islam and Democracy.... Read more
Middle East Democracy
"Easing into Islamic democracy:
Future of Muslim Brotherhood
Muslim Brotherhood And Democracy in Egypt
Habib: Democracy is Our Choice Toward a Civil State
Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt
DEMOCRACY OR WHAT ?
Analysis: Islam, democracy not mutually exclusive
Which Will It Be, Stability or Democracy?
WH On Wrong Side Of Muslim Brotherhood
Dialogue with ’Opportunists’
The Debate About The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood Continues