Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu918 2014

Last update04:30 AM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Activites
Experts: There is a real Change in US Policy and Strategy
Experts: There is a real Change in US Policy and Strategy
Experts and politicians have emphasized the existence of significant differences between Obama’s administration and Bush’s which resulted in clear change in US policy and strategy
Saturday, March 28,2009 01:53
by Mohamed Abu El-Ezz IkhwanWeb

Experts and politicians have emphasized the existence of significant differences between Obama"s administration and Bush"s which resulted in clear change in US policy and strategy.
 
This came in the symposium "Future War on Terrorism Under Obama"s Administration" organized by Sawaseya Centre for Human Rights at the headquarter of the Bar Association in Egypt, where Dr. Essam Eleryan (Head of the Political Department in Mulsim Brotherhood Group) has stressed on the existence of figures that have mark on tha face of history and policy of the US away from public politics such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Kennedy and others as he called for changing pessimistic views.
 
Elaryan has stressed that the President of USA is totally different from his precedent George W. Bush whom his mother described as "the dumbest of her children" and who waged war on the so-called terrorism for which many of the Arab nations paid of their dignities and freedom.
 
Dr. Eleryan affirmed the change in Obama"s administration as he decided the closure of Guantanamo Camp, which is the largest place in the world for human rights violations as well as his call for a dialogue with all different political movements which used to be described as "Terrorist movements".
 
On his part, Diaa Rashwan (Researcher in Islamic groups at Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies) stressed that Obama’s agenda did not include “the war on terror” and did not put it forth at all which clearly reflects the change in US policies.
 
Rashwan made a comparison between Obama and Bush in which he emphasised on the fact that Bush is a person who suffers from paranoia and hypochondria as many reports showed that he wasn’t successful in his political and personal life as his mother confirmed that he was the dumbest out of all her sons and wanted to replace that with his barbaric and ill-studied war. Rashwan has also pointed out to the ongoing conflict between the State Department and the Ministry of Defense during Bush presidency as his agenda was always a military agenda in dealing with others and he had simple and clear aspirations (either with us or against us), unlike Obama who is a more balanced and open person as there became a talk of a Christian nation and a Muslim nation. He also sent to Afghanistan and Iraq an envoy from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and not from the Ministry of Defense, which emphasized his adoption of the political agenda regarding all events.
 
Rashwan stated that there is a kind of flexibility in dealing with Al-Qaeda and Taliban, as Obama is calling for having a dialogue with Taliban.
 
He stressed on the possibility of opening the doors for an indirect dialogue with Hamas first then having a direct dialogue. Although there is a strong Israeli veto power, however the war on Gaza and the steadfastness of the resistance made the idea more possible.

 
He pointed out that the Iraq and Afghanistan issue will be politically solved approximately this year and he referred to the Turkish direction in the peace process between Israel, Syria and USA, which is also a product of the new policy that adopts political solutions instead of confrontation.
 
Rashwan did not put aside the idea of a dialogue between USA and moderate movements and groups, in particular the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Hamas and Hezbullah.
 
Dr. Ahmad Abu Baraka, (Member of MB Parliamentary Bloc) sees that extremism problem must be solved since it leads to terrorism, especially when types of extremism differ from one society to another. Abu Baraka explained that there is a need to solve the economic problems and to fix the deficits of the global capitalist system.
 
He stated that USA which declared war during the rule of the previous administration had to abide by laws and obligations of wars, agreed on internationally, however this never happened as raping, killing, displacements, excessive killing, destruction of hospitals, schools and all kinds of violation took place. He called USA to review its policies in the region as well as its policies in supporting authoritarian regimes.


Posted in Activites , Human Rights  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
To Engage or Disengage...That is the Question?
Book Review: Media Censorship in the Middle East
Mishaal: Obama using new language towards Middle East
Obama’s Middle East moment of truth
Scholars Urge Obama to Push for Democracy in Middle East
Anxiety And Engagement
Democracy Support in the Middle East
European Conflict Management in the Middle East
Middle East democratic reforms call
Human rights activists still face repression in the Middle East and North Africa
Open Letter to President Obama about Democracy Promotion in the Middle East and the Muslim World
POMED Notes: Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S., and E.U. Trialogue
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU ’Trialogue’
Pointers for the Obama Administration in the Middle East: Avoiding Myths and Vain Hopes
Morsi: Middle East and Western Countries are Equal in Terms of Dialogue
Al Baradie’s Call to the Government to Engage MB
Repairing American Public Diplomacy in the Middle East
Freedom House Middle East Map -
How democracy loses its footing in Middle East
How small steps can pave the way to democracy in the Middle East
Obama moves swiftly on Middle East
Obama’s Middle East challenge
Question for Barack Obama on Middle East Envoys: How come there ain’t no brothers on the wall?
The Middle East’s Generation Facebook
The Baby, the Bathwater, and the Freedom Agenda in the Middle East
POMED Asks: “As President, What Should Obama Say to the Middle East?”
Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President
Can Hillary be an Honest Broker in the Middle East?
POMED Notes: Middle East Institute’s 62nd Annual Conference
Obama, Middle East and the Freedom Agenda
POMED Notes: Future of the Middle East
The Near Future of Middle East Peace
More on Obama and the Middle East
More on Obama and the Middle East
Time to appoint a Middle East envoy
A reluctant Middle East
The Middle East’s Generation Facebook
2008: Who Would The Middle East Vote For?
What Bush Hath Wrought in the Middle East
New PPI Paper on US Policy toward the Middle East
Religion and Democracy in the Middle East: A New Generation of the Muslim Brotherhood
The Muslim Brotherhood is Pro-Dialogue, Engagement of Women and Copts : Habib
Arab Media and US Policy: A Public Diplomacy Reset
Islamist Pragmatists Ripe for Engagement?
U.S. engages Muslim Brotherhood despite Rice
Engaged to Hamas
To Engage or Not to Engage?
We Must Engage With Moderate Muslims
Political Islam: Ready for Engagement?
Engagement or Quarantine: How to Deal with the Islamist Advance
View from Dubai: Why the West must engage Islamists