Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Wed1022 2014

Last update05:39 AM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
Contemporary Islamists in the Middle East
Contemporary Islamists in the Middle East
I believe it is very complicated to figure our whether these Islamists are ambiguous or the West thinks of them as ambiguous. I guess these New Islamists have never been given a real chance to prove how they will govern—at least in the case MB of Egypt
Friday, October 3,2008 19:05
by spogmaykakar2.blogspot.com

Islamists and Democracy in the Middle East

The article above indicates that parliamentary elections in the last couple of years in the Middle East have resulted in the advancement of Islamic parties. In 2005, Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt run as independents in the elections and won 87 out of the 454 seats in people’s Assembly.
Islamists have managed to use religious codes in socio economic, and political levels that would fit the Islamic Law, Sharia. According to Hamzawi, the belief that regular public had on government institutions in 1950s-1980s is changing. The public do, however, expect the governments to solve their socio-economic problems. Most of these governments’ inability to fulfill the wants of the people has lead to the rise of Islamist groups. Islamist groups have become very powerful throughout the Arab world. Majorities of Arab think that secular movements of Egypt, Syria, Algeria, Morocco, and Iraq could not satisfy the socio-economic needs of its public. Islamists have provided socio-economic and educational aid to help the needy that have been overlooked by the government. Elections in Palestine and Egypt did not give enough choices for the Islamists. Muslim brotherhood is very influential in Egypt and is a very powerful Islamist party. Islamists who try to impose Sharia have been imprisoned, expelled, or even killed in arguments with government.



Bruce K. Rutherford in his article “what do Egypt’s Islamists want?Moderate Islam and the Rise of Islamic Constitutionalism” argues that Islam is facing challenges of the contemporary world governance which has led many Islamists to form political parties. The ultimate goal of these Islamists is to establish Sharia Law in the government. Many active Muslim scholars such as Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, Tariq al-Bishri, Kamal Abul al-Majd, and Muhammad Salim al-Awa have written extensively on Islamic law. Ramond Baker calls these muslims “New Islamists.” These Islamist constitutionalists emphasize that Islamic law is based on Quran and Sunnah of the prophet Muhammad which constitute Sharia. They argue that it is a state’s ultimate duty to establish sharia. There is no room for man-made law. Islamists in Egypt such as the Muslim Brotherhood argue that rulers and the ones who are ruled should all obey sharia law. According to them citizens are free to dismiss a ruler that goes against sharia.These figures do advocate a multi-party political system in which each party offers their own strategies; they argue that public should participate in the parliament of a state. And rulers should be appointed through the votes of people. Every individual should have the right to vote. They also emphasize that the rights of the people of other faiths should be protected. The concept of shura (consultation) is very important in Islam. Rulers should always consult with people when making decisions. New Islamists argue that parliament is an effective way to let public participate with the government. Muslim Brotherhood is a good example of these Islamist movements. MB wrote their own platform in October 2005 which has a lot of similarities to the United States constitution with a couple differences that Rutherford points out: MB argue that Egypt is a weak state because Egyptians have abandoned the rules of Sharia; Second important issue that Rutherford points out is the concept of hisb (verification) from the government on people.

The article I have found argues that some analysts worry about the true intentions of these Islamist groups and what they would make of Middle East if they are to come in power. It is true that Islamist groups are in severe competitions with existing governments, but it will take a while for them to actually win their arguments and establish their own political system. It is true that the west is not in favor of democracy in the region that will be in favor of conservative Islamists. The victory of Hamas in recent Palestinian election is a vivid example of this dilemma. The true intentions of the west to promote democracy are unknown in the Middle East. If democracy means giving rights to every political party, then why wasn’t Hamas given the full rights when they won the majority vote? Rutherford in his article argues that hisba interferes with the personal rights of people. Therefore, he is not sure enough of what Islamists mean when they claim that they want to give freedom to people. Rutherford says that MB is tricking the public. He says that Islamists have secret missions that people don’t know about them. He says that under sharia law people of other faiths would be significantly discriminated. He calls the Islamic constitutionalism as more ambiguous than western Democracy. He says that Islamists put little emphasis on individual rights than the west does. He believes that Islamsits’ sole focus is on building a just and pious community.

I believe it is very complicated to figure our whether these Islamists are ambiguous or the West thinks of them as ambiguous. I guess these New Islamists have never been given a real chance to prove how they will govern—at least in the case MB of Egypt.


Posted in  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Arab democracy needs ‘Islamist revision’
’Islamists edge towards democracy’
Islamist Parties and Democracy: Three Kinds of Movements
Reuters: Egypt’s Islamists Sees Election Setback in 2010
Mauritania Islamists: Military Coup Threatens the Country’s Stability
Party Leader Says Islamist Trend is Fact in Mauritania, Other Countries
Islamists gain from Mideast turmoil and democratic deficit
Arab Islamists, their internal democracy
Reform between Islamists, Secularists
Turkish Islamist Intellectuals at Left-Leaning Crossroads
The West and the Islamists
POMED Notes: Islamist Parties and Democracy
The Islamist Conundrum
EVENT on "Islamist Parties and Democracy"
Experts Urge U.S. to Talk with Islamist Movements to Encourage Democratic Trends
US/INTERNATIONAL: Dialogue with Islamists
Islamists win seats in Kuwait Parliamentary poll
Why Islamists Don’t Win Elections
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
EGYPT: Islamists Given Jail, and a Message
Jordanian Islamist warns of an unprecedented reaction if Gaza siege persisted
Ikhwanweb Featured in BBC Report: Egypt Islamists Wait for Power
Islamist Group Pressures Egypt’s Ruling Party
In Egypt, Islamist runs against the odds
Morocco Islamists Harassed by Security Services
Campaigning for all (including Islamists)
Egypt bars 90 percent of Islamist hopefuls from vote
Egypt Islamists in Hiding Ahead of Vote
700 potential opposition candidates arrested ahead of Egypt’s elections: Islamist lawmaker
Egypt Islamists fight obstacles to enter council vote
A Moderate Islamist is Arrested in Egypt - and What it Means for Us
What it means... Yemeni Islamists’ stance on democracy
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
Refusing talk to facilitate talk – the paradox of Islamist dialogue: An overdue task or an exercise
Islamist Movements and the Political Challenge: An Alternate Perspective
Let’s not forget the moderate Islamists
The Islamist opposition online in Egypt and Jordan